Detraining and Deloading for Powerlifting

Detraining (DT) is the notion of taking a rest away from exercise for the purposes of recovery before retraining again.  Deloading (DL) is the idea of reducing the training load whilst maintaining some level of training. The purpose of this article is to explore the changes undergone when resistance training, the damage exercise induces to muscles and the recovery period needed from that, what happens during a DT and DL phase and how to suitably prescribe DT/DL to an athlete.

You can click on the headings below to jump to that part of the article:

How the body adapts to resistance training

During early phases of resistance training, such as those experienced by people who have never undergone resistance training before, 60% of the changes to strength are from changes to the neural drive and possibly muscle architecture (27). This has since been proven by increases in Electromyography (EMG) signal amplitude (1) and rate of EMG rise in early phase of muscle contraction after 10 and 14 weeks of training. 

This is particularly relevant to females who show strength improvements due to factors other than muscle mass changes (14). Female strength training can elicit slower hypertrophy responses in upper body compound exercises, such as the bench press, in the first 10 weeks of resistance training (57).

Strength development is a blend of neural and physiological changes. These changes could also affect the genders differently which will be key to effective programming and deload training.

Physiological changes to strength training include (9):

  • An increase in cross-sectional area (CSA) of the whole muscle (32)
  • An increase in individual muscle fibres due to an increase in myofibrillar size and number
  • Satellite cells are activated in the early stages of training then later fuse with existing fibres which appears to be associated with the hypertrophy response
  • Changes in muscle fibre type increasing the 11a and 11ab (34)
  • Changes in muscle fibre length
  • Changes in pennation angle
  • Changes in myofilament density
  • Increases in muscle tendon CSA and stiffness after 2 months of resistance training (19)

How the body is affected during a detraining phase

During a DT phase, strength decreases have been reported from between 6 to 9% following a 4 week total exercise abstinence for both lower and upper body (15). Whereas power decreases can be as much as 14 to 17% (15. 18) with anaerobic changes returning to base line after 4 months of exercise cessation (8).

One of the main physiological changes when developing strength is in the ratio of muscle fibre (MF) type, viz. increases in IIa and IIab with decreases in IIb (934).  A DT phase for longer than a 4 week period will see an increase in the IIb muscle fibres and decreases in IIa and IIab (34) which will have a negative impact on strength and be partly responsible for the reported decreases in strength above.

Satelitte cells are normally dormant cells, found only in adult muscle, and serve as a reserve set of cells (25). These reserve cells are able to proliferate in response to injury and give rise to regenerated muscle and to more satellite cells. This proliferation is experienced during initial phases of strength training. This is the cause for MF length increases (25) which has been associated with the changes experienced during strength training (17).  Changes to satellite cell count can increase by as much as 31% after 90 days of training. DT for up to 10 days can continue this increase in satellite cells (figure 1) after which they will slowly decline to pre-training levels after 90 days of detraining (16).

Figure 1: Satellite cell number before training (pre), after 30 (T30) and 90 (T90) days of training followed by a 3 (D3), 10 (D10), 30 (D30), 60 (D60) and 90 (D90) days of detraining (Kadi et al, 2004).

The changes to MF type after DT have been reported to take as long as 12 weeks to take effect (13). This indicates neural adaptations and changes are integral to the changes experienced over shorter periods. A decline in neural activation has been shown after a 6 week DT phase (33) although will remain above baseline for as long in 31 weeks (14). Thus highlighting the faster rate of change for the neuromuscular system than for those within the muscle structure.

Figure 1: Shima (2002) rate of Maximal Voluntary Contraction of the Lower leg muscles during pre training, post 6 weeks of training and after 6 weeks detraining

Changes to the elongation and stiffness of muscle tendons during resistance training take longer than neural and strength adaptations by up to 2 months (19).  However, post training rest periods show the tendons also take longer to return to baseline. Reported stiffness starting at 19.4 N/mm pre-training changed to 37.2 N/mm after 3 months of resistance training then adapted to 32N/mm after 1 month of DT.  Similarly, the elongation of the tendon reduced from 5.3mm pre-training to 3.6mm after 3 months of resistance training and returned to 5.4mm after one month of DT (19).  The effect of DT on tendon stiffness and CSA changes will be detrimental if a sustained period of DT is taken, longer than 4 weeks (20).

Exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) can have many different effects on performance, viz. delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) (2421), reduced strength (10) and a smaller range of motion (ROM) (31).

If EIMD continues to have these impacts on training a slow decline in strength improvements could be experienced. Although exercise on damaged muscles will not increase the damage seen and will not decrease the rate of recovery, it will impede muscular adaptation (2829).

The predominant amount of damage is seen in type IIa and IIab MF types and have shown to cause the longest duration of muscle damage preventing adaptations (3). However, this is seen less so in young men due to their lower rate of these MF types and nautrally being more flexible (22).  This is why it is so important for strength athletes to take a period of recovery as the MF types they are trying to increase are those that require the longest duration for damage recovery.

How to optimise a recovery period

Strength can maintain for up to 4 weeks of a complete exercise abstinence, termed here a DT phase, and is most affected following this from 5 to 16 weeks in moderately trained populations (23). For highly trained athletes strength values start declining after 3 weeks (24. 26).  This period of strength maintenance is because the physiological and neurological changes have not begun to negatively affect the muscles performance (26).

The duration of a DT is as important as period of time to retraining and strength testing.  16 weeks of DT has been shown to significantly affect strength (23). With only an 8-week retraining period strength values remained the same after the initial 12 week training phase (31), although this was tested on an older population.  A 16 week DT phase, as seen from Marques (23), will induce significant strength decreases anyway. Allowing for a small DT phase such as the recommended 3 weeks (24. 26) would minimise the any negative physical changes and mean a successful and fast retraining phase should ensue.

Practical applications

It has been reported that resistance trained people can be split in to three groups; high >15%, medium 15-5%, low responders <5% (30). Those who responded quickly to hypertrophy improvements, high responders, reduced in their developments quicker (-9.3%±5.7 for muscle CSA and -2.1±3.1% for 1RM) than low responders during a 6-week DT (-0.5±8.4% for muscle CSA and +0.1.9±3.4 for 1RM).

Previous research indicates a 4-week reduction in training volume (repetitions multiplied by sets), termed here a DL, whilst keeping intensity high (percent of 1RM) saw an increase in muscular strength of 2% although no change in power output (15).

Therefore, providing an athlete with a complete exercise cessation for between 7 to 10 days (DT), and no longer than 3 weeks, will ensure satellite cell levels are raised, neurological adaptations have not yet started to change and will mitigate any declines in strength meaning a more advantageous starting point for the retraining phase.  Providing the athlete with a DL by reducing volume but maintaining intensity for 4-weeks may maintain or continue to improve strength development. However, this may not have the desired recovery effect on other physiological factors such as muscular damage recovery and tendon recovery.  Furthermore, retraining for 6 weeks can return the athlete back to training status with an additional 7 weeks continuing the improvements above previous training phase (34).


References

1. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2002; 93(4):1318–26.
2. Armstrong RB. Mechanisms of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness: a brief review. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise. 1984; 16(6):529–38.
3. Chapman D, Newton M, Sacco P, Nosaka K. Greater Muscle Damage Induced by Fast Versus Slow Velocity Eccentric Exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006; 27(8):591–8.
4. Cheung K, Hume PA, Maxwell L. Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. Sports Medicine. 2003;33(2):145–164.
5. Chilibeck PD, Calder AW, Sale DG, Webber CE. A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women. Europdean Journal of Applied Physiology. 1997; 77(1):170–5.
6. Clarkson RJ, Quintana R, Parker DL, Frankel CC. Response of males and females to high-force eccentric exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998;30(6):869–879.
7. Delmonico MJ, Kostek MC, Doldo NA, Hand BD, Bailey JA, Rabon-Stith KM, et al. Effects of moderate-velocity strength training on peak muscle power and movement velocity: do women respond differently than men? Journal of Applied Physiology. 2005; 99(5):1712–8.
8. Fatouros IG, Kambas A, Katrabasas I, Nikolaidis K, Chatzinikolaou A, Leontsini D, et al. Strength training and detraining effects on muscular strength, anaerobic power, and mobility of inactive older men are intensity dependent. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005; 39(10):776–80.
9. Folland JP, Williams AG. Morphological and Neurological Contributions to Increased Strength. Sports Medicine. 2007; 37(2):145–68.
10. García-López D, de Paz JA, Jiménez-Jiménez R, Bresciani G, De Souza-Teixeira F, Herrero JA, et al. Early explosive force reduction associated with exercise-induced muscle damage. Journal of Physiology and Biochemechanics. 2006 Sep 1; 62(3):163.
11. Häkkinen K, Komi PV. Electromyographic changes during strength training and detraining. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise. 1983; 15(6):455–60.
12. Häkkinen K, Alén M, Komi PV. Changes in isometric force- and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics of human skeletal muscle during strength training and detraining. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1985; 125(4):573–85.
13. Houston ME, Froese EA, Valeriote SP, Green HJ, Ranney DA. Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: A one leg model. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 1983; 51(1):25–35.
14. Ivey FM, Tracy BL, Lemmer JT, NessAiver M, Metter EJ, Fozard JL, et al. Effects of Strength Training and Detraining on Muscle QualityAge and Gender Comparisons. Journal of Gerontology. 2000; 55(3):B152–7.
15. Izquierdo M, Ibañez J, González-Badillo JJ, Ratamess NA, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K, et al. Detraining and tapering effects on hormonal responses and strength performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2007; 21(3):768–75.
16. Kadi F, Schjerling P, Andersen LL, Charifi N, Madsen JL, Christensen LR, et al. The effects of heavy resistance training and detraining on satellite cells in human skeletal muscles. The Journal of Physiology. 2004; 558(3):1005–12.
17. Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Kubo K, Ito M, Imai M, Fukunaga T. Architecture of Contracting Human Muscles and Its Functional Significance. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2000; 6(1):88-97.
18. Kraemer WJ, Koziris LP, Ratamess NA, Hakkinen K, Triplett-Mcbride NT, Fry AC, et al. Detraining produces minimal changes in physical performance and hormonal variables in recreationally strength-trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2002; 16(3):373–82.
19. Kubo K, Ikebukuro T, Yata H, Tsunoda N, Kanehisa H. Time Course of Changes in Muscle and Tendon Properties During Strength Training and Detraining. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010; 24(2):322.
20. Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. The impact of loading, unloading, ageing and injury on the human tendon. The Journal of Physiology. 2019; 597(5):1283–98.
21. Mair J, Mayr M, Mullet E, Koller A, Haid C, Artner-Dworzak E, et al. Rapid Adaptation to Eccentric Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 1995; 16(6):352–6.
22. Marginson V, Rowlands AV, Gleeson NP, Eston RG. Comparison of the symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage after an initial and repeated bout of plyometric exercise in men and boys. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2005 Sep;99(3):1174–81.
23. Marques MC, Casimiro FLM, Marinho DA, Costa AFMMC da. Training and detraining effects on strength parameters in young volleyball players: volume distribution implications. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física. 2011; 17(2):235–43.
24. McMaster DT, Gill N, Cronin J, McGuigan M. The development, retention and decay rates of strength and power in elite rugby union, rugby league and American football: a systematic review. Sports Medicine. 2013; 43(5):367–84.
25. Morgan JE, Partridge TA. Muscle satellite cells. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology . 2003 Aug 1; 35(8):1151–6.
26. Mujika I, Padilla S. Muscular characteristics of detraining in humans. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise. 2001; 33(8):1297–303.
27. Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, Minetti AE, Cerretelli P. Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 1989; 59(4):310–9.
28. Nosaka K, Newton M. Repeated eccentric exercise bouts do not exacerbate muscle damage and repair. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2002;16(1):117–122
29. Paddon-Jones D, Muthalib M, Jenkins D. The effects of a repeated bout of eccentric exercise on indices of muscle damage and delayed onset muscle soreness. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2000 Mar;3(1):35–43.
30. Räntilä A, Pätsi V, Restucia J, Mika Heikkilä M, Simola L, Nurminen M, et al. High responders to strength training tend to lose more muscle mass and strength during the detraining phase than low responders. Seminar presented at; 2018; Neuromuscular Research Center and Biology of Physical Activity, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä
31. Rinard J, Clarkson PM, Smith LL, Grossman M. Response of males and females to high-force eccentric exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2000; 18(4):229–36.
31. Sakugawa RL, Moura BM, Orssatto LB da R, Bezerra E de S, Cadore EL, Diefenthaeler F. Effects of resistance training, detraining, and retraining on strength and functional capacity in elderly. Ageing Clinical Experimental Research. 2019; 31(1):31–9.
32. Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2007; 102(1):368–73.
33. Shima N, Ishida K, Katayama K, Morotome Y, Sato Y, Miyamura M. Cross education of muscular strength during unilateral resistance training and detraining. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2002; 86(4):287–94.
34. Staron R, Leondardi M, Karapondo D, Malicky E, Falkel J, Hagerman F, et al. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. Journal of Applied Physiology. Applied Physiology. 1991; 70(2):631–40.
35. Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Hooper SL, Locke S, Purdam C, Cook JL. The time course of in vivo recovery of transverse strain in high-stress tendons following exercise. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014; 48(5):383–7.